Yes, HR and upper management can and sometimes do protect toxic managers by prioritizing the company’s interests—such as minimizing legal risk, protecting reputation, or retaining high-performing individuals—over addressing toxic behavior itself. This protection can manifest in several ways, including dismissing complaints, downplaying issues, or transferring problematic managers rather than disciplining them. Sometimes, HR or leadership may initiate lengthy investigations that lead nowhere, create bureaucratic obstacles for complainants, or even retaliate against employees who raise concerns.
The extent to which this occurs varies widely: some organizations have robust systems for reporting and accountability, including confidential hotlines, third-party investigators, and transparent disciplinary processes, while others lack transparency, allowing harmful behaviors to persist unchecked. Ultimately, the effectiveness of HR intervention depends on organizational culture, leadership values, whistleblower protections, and the presence of clear, enforced policies for addressing misconduct. Organizations with strong ethical foundations and a commitment to employee well-being are more likely to address toxic behavior decisively, while those focused primarily on short-term results may inadvertently enable it.